.webp)
If traditional real estate investing feels like moving marble blocks—heavy, slow, and expensive—tokenization is the crane that makes those blocks glide. By representing equity, debt, or revenue rights as digital tokens on regulated ledgers, investors can subscribe, transfer, collateralize, and distribute proceeds with fewer frictions and richer data. The time to deploy shortens; audit trails strengthen; and private markets inch closer to public-market operability—but without sacrificing discretion.
Why now? Three converging shifts:
The promise, however, is not that tokens magically replace land registries or notaries. In civil-law systems (including France and Saint-Barthélemy), title still anchors in notarial acts and registries. What tokens do is simplify everything around the deed: raising capital, documenting rights, routing cash flows, and proving compliance. Chez SBH Capital Partners, nous aidons nos clients à transformer leurs actifs numériques en patrimoine tangible.
Key idea: tokenization is not “crypto instead of law”; it is code plus law—the best of automation inside the boundaries of enforceable property rights. lawcom.gov.uk
Tokenization is the issuance of a digital representation of a claim or right on a distributed ledger. That representation can map to (i) equity in a property-owning company, (ii) debt secured against a property, (iii) a share/unit in a regulated fund or SPV, or (iv) revenue-sharing or cash-flow notes. Crucially, in most jurisdictions the token is not the land title; the token references rights that are perfected and enforceable off-chain via corporate, fund, and property law—then mirrored on-chain for transfer and lifecycle events. As the UK Law Commission has stressed, legal systems are beginning to recognise a distinct category of personal property capable of accommodating certain digital assets; that conceptual clarity supports enforceability without pretending a token is, by itself, a deed. lawcom.gov.uk+1
In the EU, tokenized financial instruments (eg, tokenized shares or bonds of an SPV) may operate under the DLT Pilot Regime, which provides a regulated environment for DLT trading and settlement systems (DLT MTF/SS/TSS). For unregulated utility-style tokens, MiCA sets disclosure and conduct rules for CASPs, and establishes a strict framework for e-money tokens and asset-referenced tokens (eg, stablecoins used in settlement). For real estate, this matters because cash legs and custody must occur under participants that banks and notaries can recognise. ESMA+2AMF+2
What about tokenizing land title itself? Academic and policy work is clear: until registries and conveyancing law change, tokens alone cannot transfer real property. In France, for instance, cadastral registration and the notary’s public-officer role remain central to conveyance. Tokenized title would require explicit legislative and registry reforms (some pilots imagine permissioned ledgers operated by public authorities). Therefore, the pragmatic route is tokenising claims (equity, debt, fund units) while keeping title with the notary and land registry. legalico.io+2cred.u-paris2.fr+2
Bottom line: tokenization simplifies ownership mechanics and capital flows, not the existence of property law. It’s the API to the traditional system—not a parallel universe.
A) Capital formation and access.
Before tokens, fractional access to trophy assets required either complex fund structures or expensive listings. Tokens allow precision sizing (smaller tickets, staged commitments), faster subscriptions, and programmable eligibility gates (jurisdiction, KYC status, sophistication). Secondary transfers—when permitted—can occur on regulated venues with compliant whitelists instead of bespoke novations each time. OECD, BIS, and IMF work highlight that tokenization can compress issuance and post-trade costs and improve market completeness. OECD+2Banque des Règlements Internationaux+2
B) Lifecycle automation.
Rent collection, expense waterfalls, interest accrual, and distribution events can be codified. Rather than quarterly email rounds and spreadsheets, investors view on-chain states and receive programmed distributions (subject to off-chain approvals where required). That reduces operational risk and lifts reporting frequency from quarterly to near-real time—while preserving off-chain audit evidence.
C) Settlement and reconciliation.
With MiCA-authorised (or transitional) CASPs and DLT settlement systems, the ”who/what/when” of transfers is structured. EU rules bring crypto transfers under travel-rule identity discipline; tax frameworks like DAC8 and the OECD’s CARF extend automatic exchange to crypto events. Practically, that means fewer bank holds and cleaner notary files because identity travels with value and books will later match what platforms report. AMF+1
D) Interoperability with money.
Tokenized assets are most useful when money is also tokenised—or at least when settlement occurs against regulated e-money tokens or bank liabilities. Central bank and supervisor projects (BIS, MAS Project Guardian) explore tokenised deposits and on-chain FX for institutional settlement, which shortens closing cycles and reduces counterparty risk. Banque des Règlements Internationaux+2Ministère des Finances+2
E) Data-rich compliance.
By design, token systems emit machine-readable evidence: timestamps, counterparties, asset identifiers, and hash-linked document references. That’s a dream for auditors, regulators, and notaries—provided the legal wrapper is right. The output becomes a notary-grade pack instead of a patchwork of PDFs.
Metaphor: tokenization turns the portfolio from a filing cabinet into a database with workflows. The law remains the foundation; the interface becomes fast, searchable, and programmable.
1) Choose the correct legal wrapper.
In civil-law systems, tokenize the vehicle, not the registry*:
2) Anchor venue and rails in EU-grade regulation.
For secondary liquidity in the EU, evaluate DLT infrastructure under the DLT Pilot Regime. For primary issuance and custody/execution, use MiCA-authorised CASPs (or those in transitional periods where permitted). For settlement legs, ensure e-money tokens or bank transfer processes align with EBA and travel-rule obligations. Archive authorisation/transitional letters and safeguarding statements in the data room. ESMA+2AMF+2
3) Program eligibility and compliance.
Whitelist investors using KYC/AML gates; encode jurisdictional exclusions; and apply transfer restrictions (eg, lock-ups, professional-only flags). This enforces rules ex ante instead of policing them ex post.
4) Build for reporting symmetry (DAC8/CARF).
Design ledgers so reportable fields (asset ID, timestamps, gross proceeds, counterparty identifiers) are exportable for DAC8 (from 2026 in the EU) and CARF (from ~2027/28 globally). Compliance is not a year-end scramble; it’s an always-on data discipline. Ministère des Finances+1
5) Keep title and registry logic sacred.
Don’t present a token as a land deed unless the law says so. Maintain notarial control of conveyances and link token lifecycle to board minutes and registry updates. Academic and policy work attests: without legislative reform, blockchain ≠ land title. cred.u-paris2.fr+1
6) Use tokenization where it pays.
High-value private assets with stable cash flows and professional governance are ideal: luxury residential portfolios with rental programs, prime hospitality, core offices with long leases, or development finance with staged drawdowns. Tokens add the most value where admin is heavy and ownership wants precision.
Analogy: Don’t try to turn the courthouse into a blockchain. Turn your cap table, treasury, and investor ops into software—then let the notary do what only the notary can do.
Our mission is simple: reduce friction, not substance. In Saint-Barthélemy we operate within French legal certainty and local fiscal autonomy to convert digital wealth into real, bank-cleared property exposure—with or without tokenization, depending on your needs.
What we deliver: