1) Introduction — From experiments to an executable standard
The last cycle proved that crypto can fund real assets. The next cycle will prove that it can do so at institutional scale, repeatedly, under European and OECD rules without losing speed or discretion. The catalysts are clear:
- MiCA brings a common authorisation and conduct framework to EU crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), with the main CASP regime applying from 30 December 2024 and a transitional runway (member-state dependent) until 1 July 2026 for incumbents. For boards, that means counterparties you can actually vet on paper. CSSF+3ESMA+3AMF+3
- The EU “travel rule” (Regulation (EU) 2023/1113), backed by EBA guidelines effective 30 December 2024, forces originator/beneficiary data to ride with transfers—the same “identity with the funds” principle banks use for fiat. This shrinks compliance ambiguity at landing. Eucrim+3Autorité Bancaire Européenne+3aAutorité Bancaire Européenne+3
- DAC8 (EU) and the OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) extend automatic exchange to crypto. First DAC8 reporting year is 2026; CARF first exchanges 2027/2028 depending on jurisdiction. Institutional buyers now design ledgers that will reconcile with tax-authority mirrors. PwC+3Taxation and Customs Union+3Regnology+3
In short: the legal and supervisory scaffolding is finally tall enough to carry serious money across the gap between on-chain liquidity and off-chain title. Chez SBH Capital Partners, nous aidons nos clients à transformer leurs actifs numériques en patrimoine tangible.
Metaphor: Think of 2021–2023 as building a pier. 2026 builds the bridge—four lanes, signed, lit, and insured.
2) Definitions — What “institutional crypto-real-estate” means in practice
Institutional buyers aren’t just “bigger retail.” They require repeatable processes, governance artifacts, and liability shields. In this context:
Institutional crypto-real-estate transaction = a purchase of a high-value property where the capital stack includes digital assets—whether settled in fiat post-conversion, or (in specific cases) through tokenised instruments—executed under regulated counterparties, with notarial validation and bank-compliant documentation.
Key building blocks:
- Regulated rails (MiCA-aligned CASPs/OTCs). From 30 Dec 2024, CASPs sit under the MiCA conduct/authorisation perimeter; incumbents may rely on a transitional regime to 1 July 2026, subject to member-state choices. Letters on letterhead (authorisation or transitional status) and safeguarding wording are now standard parts of the file. ESMA+1
- Identity continuity (EU travel rule). Providers must detect missing payer/payee data and reject or return transfers lacking required fields. In practice, that means deal desks align KYC/beneficiary fields before moving size. Autorité Bancaire Européenne+1
- Reporting symmetry (DAC8/CARF). Ledgers and data rooms are designed to match what platforms and intermediaries will report: asset identifiers, timestamps, gross proceeds, counterparty IDs. First DAC8 reporting is for 2026; CARF exchanges commence 2027/2028. Taxation and Customs Union+2OECD+2
- Civil-law execution (France/Saint-Barth). Notaries act as public officers; their AML expectations drive closing readiness. The best crypto-funded deals present a Funds-Mapping Memo (wallet → CASP/OTC → local corporate account → notary escrow → deed) with exhibits: on-chain analytics, deal tickets, SWIFT MTs, board resolutions.
Tokenisation adds optional acceleration: using asset-backed tokens (or units of a regulated vehicle) to fractionalise equity, refinance, or manage distributions. But even tokenised structures must reconcile to title and land registries. Tokens are not title unless the jurisdiction explicitly says so; they are instruments that map to legal rights.
Analogy: If fiat closings are sheet music, institutional crypto closings are orchestral scores—same melody, more parts, tighter cues.
3) The institutional pain points — and why 2026 fixes many of them
1) Counterparty opacity.
In the previous cycle, exchanges and OTC desks were difficult to benchmark. MiCA solves for this with a common authorisation spine and transitional rules that boards can diligence—who is allowed to do what, where, and until when. Expect RFPs that mandate MiCA authorisation number or transitional letter as a gate. ESMA+1
2) Identity dislocation between crypto and fiat.
Pre-2024, travel-rule coverage was patchy. In the EU, Reg. 2023/1113 and EBA guidelines (application 30 Dec 2024) standardise the payload and the reject/return playbook when data is missing. Outcome: fewer frozen funds, faster reconciliation. Autorité Bancaire Européenne+1
3) Reporting asymmetry.
Boards feared that future tax reporting would contradict internal books. DAC8 locks the EU calendar (apply from 1 Jan 2026), and CARF defines the global mirror with first exchanges 2027–2028. Investors are now building CARF/DAC8-ready ledgers from day one. Taxation and Customs Union+1
4) Notarial uncertainty.
Notaries need a file they can audit in minutes. Without a linear funds map and clear corporate governance, they must escalate AML, slowing everything. Institutional standard: a three-page memo + exhibits, bilingual where helpful, that makes the AML checks self-evident.
5) Jurisdictional incoherence.
Funds earned in one tax sphere, converted in a second, landed in a third—this straddling triggers questions and, sometimes, tax friction. The modern solution is single-jurisdiction corridors: convert where you buy, where you bank, and where you govern.
6) Tokenisation without title logic.
Tokens were sometimes treated as deeds. Institutions now ask: what legal right does this token grant? Is it a unit in a regulated vehicle? How do redemptions and transfers map to land-registry events? The next vintage of token deals answers these with prospectus-grade clarity.
Metaphor: In 2024, many projects tried to sail against the wind. In 2026, regulation turns the wind, so properly-rigged ships move faster with less effort.
4) Solutions & strategies — The executable playbook
A. Build a regulated conversion corridor
- Choose MiCA-aligned rails. Select CASPs/OTCs with authorisation or transitional letters on letterhead and named compliance contacts. File the documents alongside Service Descriptions (execution, custody, settlement). No paper, no trade. ESMA+1
- Program the travel-rule payload. Before moving size, confirm originator/beneficiary fields, identifiers, and callback procedures; archive EBA-aligned logs. This is the crypto equivalent of pre-advising a large wire. Autorité Bancaire Européenne
- Rehearse the landing. Have SWIFT MT formats and notary escrow details pre-approved. Ensure the beneficiary account matches the legal buyer (usually a single-asset local company).
B. Use local companies with on-island management
- Incorporate a 100% client-owned acquisition company with registered office, local accounting, and local bank account.
- Appoint a local manager (gérant) who chairs board meetings on island and signs payment instructions. This creates effective management facts that banks and notaries recognise. La gérance locale garantit la résidence fiscale de la société et la conformité internationale.
- Keep flows within one perimeter: wallet → CASP/OTC → local company → notary escrow.
C. Make your file notary-grade by design
- Produce a Funds-Mapping Memo (3 pages): Provenance → Counterparty → Settlement → Bank landing → Escrow → Deed.
- Attach exhibits: on-chain analytics, exchange/custodian statements, deal tickets, settlement receipts, travel-rule logs, SWIFT MTs, board resolutions.
- Share a tidy data room, version-controlled and access-logged.
D. Pre-wire for DAC8/CARF
- Mirror reportable fields in your general ledger: asset ID, tx hash/timestamp, gross proceeds/cost, counterparty identifiers.
- Run quarterly reconciliations between internal books and platform exports so that 2026 (DAC8) and 2027/2028 (CARF) reporting aligns without drama. Taxation and Customs Union+1
E. Tokenisation where it adds utility
- Use tokenisation to fractionalise equity after acquisition, manage investor on-boarding, or refinance under regulated wrappers. Tie tokens to clear legal claims (units/shares, revenue-sharing notes) and define conversion events that map to land-registry or notarial acts.
Bottom line: institutions don’t need exotic tricks—they need repeatable, jurisdiction-coherent closings that pass internal audit and external supervision.
5) SBH Capital Partners — Converting digital performance into deed-ready euros
What we solve: institutional buyers want speed without shortcuts. We build the corridor that keeps compliance, tax neutrality, and execution in one straight line.
1) A full Saint-Barth perimeter.
.webp)
.jpeg)
